MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415431106 · doi:10.1145/3760544.3764131

Tradeoff Between Energy Consumption and BER Performance in Molecular Communications

2025· article· W4415431106 on OpenAlexaff
Dongliang Jing, Linjuan Li, Andrew W. Eckford

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMolecular communicationEnergy consumptionTransmitterEnergy (signal processing)Bit error rateCommunications systemFunction (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In molecular communication (MC) systems, energy consumption plays a critical role in determining the bit error rate (BER) performance. This paper investigates an MC system with an imperfect transmitter that collects two types of molecules from the environment and releases them as a mixture. The receiver is equipped with receptors that selectively bind only to one target molecule type. The presence of non-target (interference) molecules in the transmitted mixture weakens the effective signal strength, thereby degrading detection accuracy. To mitigate this issue, the transmitter can selectively remove non-target molecules, enhancing the molecular purity of the transmitted signal. However, this purification process incurs additional energy consumption, introducing a fundamental trade-off between energy efficiency and communication reliability. To address this, we formulate a tradeoff function that jointly characterizes the energy consumption and BER performance. A grid search algorithm is then employed to identify the optimal energy allocation that minimizes the tradeoff function. Theoretical analysis and simulation results confirm the validity of the proposed framework, highlighting its utility in optimizing energy-efficient design for MC systems operating under energy constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMolecular Communication and NanonetworksFrench-language works237,207