MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415432010 · doi:10.7202/1119360ar

Soutenir les élèves de 5 <sup>e</sup>  année du primaire lors de l’écriture de textes informatifs1

2024· article· fr· W4415432010 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Catherine Turcotte, Nathalie Prévost, Pier‐Olivier Caron

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWriting and Handwriting Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité TÉLUQUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)Order (exchange)Context (archaeology)Identity (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude a examiné l’intérêt de mesures de soutien à l’écriture de textes informatifs. Des tâches d’écriture de textes informatifs ayant des structures comparative, séquentielle et cause-effet ont été soumises à 179 élèves de cinquième année du primaire. Ces élèves avaient accès à une liste de mots ou à une capsule vidéo pour les soutenir. Les résultats d’analyses descriptives et multiniveaux révèlent que les sujets de rédaction, rattachés à des structures précises, ont un effet important sur la qualité des productions. Quant au soutien, la capsule a un effet plus positif que la liste de mots, mais cet effet est de petite taille.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicWriting and Handwriting EducationFrench-language works237,207