MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415433725 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202508-2055st

Care of Infants and Children with Tracheostomies. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

2025· article· en· W4415433725 on OpenAlexaff
Reshma Amin, Amit Agarwal, Jackie Chiang, Joseph M. Collaco, A. Ioana Cristea, Evan J. Propst, Sarah A. Sobotka, Karthik Balakrishnan, Dan Benscoter, Michael Brenner, Maria L. Castro‐Codesal, Milenka Cuevas Guamán, Cori Daines, Jessica A. Dawson, Jeffrey D. Edwards, Robert J. Graham, J. Henningfeld, Nadia E Hoekstra, Arwen Jackson, Romaine F. Johnson, Karen Kam, Sheila S. Kun, Natalie Napolitano, Álvaro Pacheco, Howard B. Panitch, Jeremy D. Prager, Jenny Shi, M. Soma, Aaron St‐Laurent, Faiza Syed, Karen Watters, David Zielinski, An Thi Nhat Ho, Ravi Kanth Velagapudi, Fatima Zeba, Shandra L. Knight, Narayan P. Iyer, Christopher D. Baker

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of AlbertaStollery Children's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuidelineMultidisciplinary approachClinical PracticeGrading (engineering)PulmonologistsMEDLINEBest practiceAppropriate Use CriteriaPatient safety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These guidelines aim to standardize and improve the management of pediatric patients with tracheostomies by providing evidence-based recommendations for ethical considerations, discharge planning, and diagnostic assessments. Implementing these guidelines aims to enhance patient safety and quality of life through a structured and patient-centered approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207