MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temporal diffuser: Timing scale-aware modulation for sign language production

2025· article· en· W4415434080 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kim-Thuy Kha, Anh H. Vo, Van-Vang Le, Oh-Young Song, Yong-Guk Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology PromotionInformation Technology Research CentreMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of EducationSejong University
KeywordsSign languagePoolingNoise reductionPipeline (software)FidelityAutoregressive modelFlexibility (engineering)Modulation (music)Production (economics)Motion (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in Sign Language Production (SLP) highlight denoising diffusion models as promising alternatives to traditional autoregressive methods. Most existing approaches follow a two-stage pipeline that encodes sign motion into discrete latent codes, often sacrificing Space–Time fidelity and requiring gloss annotations or complex codebooks. Transformer-based models aim to simplify this, but often produce overly smooth, unnatural motions. We introduce Sign Language Production with Scale-Aware Modulation (SignSAM), a novel single-stage, gloss-free SLP framework that directly synthesizes motion in continuous space, preserving fine temporal details. At its core is a Space–Time U-Net that learns compact temporal features by jointly downscaling the frame and sign feature dimensions, thereby reducing computational cost compared to a no-pyramid UNet or a pyramid UNet without consistency between dimensions. To further enhance temporal precision, we propose a Timing Scale-Aware Modulation module that fuses multiscale temporal resolutions for better motion coherence. Experiments on PHOENIX14T and How2Sign show that SignSAM achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) fluency, accuracy, and naturalness, offering an efficient and expressive solution for SLP. Our project homepage is https://kha-kim-thuy.github.io/SLP-Demo/ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceSame topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207