MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415434462 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfaf116.1330

#3044 Cognitive functions in elderly and senile patients with arterial hypertension, depending on the presence of concomitant chronic kidney disease stage 3A and 3B

2025· article· en· W4415434462 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
О. Д. Остроумова, K. K. Dzamikhov, А. И. Кочетков, С. А. Литвинова, T. M. Ostroumova, E. Yu. Ebzeeva

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKidney diseaseDigit symbol substitution testMontreal Cognitive AssessmentConcomitantComorbidityCognitionVerbal fluency testLogistic regressionRenal function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background the frequent comorbidity of arterial hypertension (AH) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), each of which is a risk factor for cognitive impairment, determines the need to diagnose cognitive deficits in these multimorbid patients. Aims to assess the impact of concomitant CKD on cognitive functions (CF) in elderly and senile patients with AH. Materials and methods 330 patients ≥60 years old with АH were included and divided into 2 groups: (1)—without CKD (n = 110, mean age 76 [69.8; 82.3] years, 45.5% women), (2) —patients with CKD G3a/G3b (n = 220, mean age 81 [73;85] years, 53.6% women). All the patients underwent cognitive assessment including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSЕ), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Verbal fluency test. Results patients with CKD G3a/G3b, compared to patients without CKD, had significantly lower MoCA (23 [21; 25] versus 24 [22; 26] points, respectively, P = 0.005) and MMSE (27 [25; 29] versus 28 [25.8; 29] points, respectively, P = 0.002) scores and significantly higher ADAS-cog score (14 [11; 18] versus 11 [9; 15] points, P < 0.001), worse letter fluency (11 [10; 13] versus 12 [11; 13] words, respectively, P < 0.001), and worse DSST score (20 [17; 23] versus 21.5 [19; 25], respectively, P < 0.001). Patients with CKD G3b compared G3a and without CKD had worse MoCА, MMSE, and ADAS-cog results. In the single-factor logistic regression analysis, there was significant association between decreased MMSE scores (≤23 points) and stage G3a and G3b CKD: (odds ratio [OR] 3.25, P = 0.048; and OR 5.53, P = 0.003, respectively). There was also an association between decreased MoCA scores (≤25 points) and CKD G3a and G3b: OR 1.97, P = 0.040 and OR 2.24, P = 0.016, respectively. Conclusion our results indicate an unfavorable effect of concomitant CKD stage G3a/G3b on the CF of elderly and senile patients with AH and a worsening of CF as the severity of CKD increases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207