MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415436692 · doi:10.1016/j.net.2025.103998

Results of the IAEA coordinated research project enhancing computer security for radiation detection systems

2025· article· en· W4415436692 on OpenAlexaff
Rodney Busquim Silva, Michael Rowland, Ricardo Paulino Marques, Isabelle Coelho Franco, Jianghai Li, Tamás Holczer, Khalil El‐Khatib, Nelson Agbemava, I Putu Susila, Jacek Gajewski, David K. Allison, Imbaby I. Mahmoud, Greg White

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Engineering and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersInternational Atomic Energy Agency
KeywordsIntrusion detection systemAnomaly detectionDetectorWirelessVulnerability (computing)Data transmissionTransmission (telecommunications)Cloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents results of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on Enhancing Computer Security for Radiation Detection Systems. These systems include a wide range of fixed and mobile radiation detectors used in safety and security applications. The signals and data generated by radiation detection systems are transmitted to local or remote monitoring centers through various communication channels, enhancing the effectiveness of threat detection and enabling a timely response to alarm conditions. However, during the generation, processing, transmission and display of this information, data can be compromised. This CRP brought together 11 research institutes from 10 Member States to explore various topics, including threat modeling, cloud computing, malware propagation in large radiation detection networks, intrusion detection systems, defensive computer security architecture, wireless communication security, and simulation of integrated physical protection and radiation detection systems. The participating institutes created a reference architecture, designed models for synthetic radiation data and anomaly detection methods, performed vulnerability assessments of radiation detection systems, and developed prototypes for both virtual and hardware-in-the-loop testbeds. Their research also led to the creation of simulators, including a physical protection–radiation detector simulator that incorporates a 3D hospital model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Engineering and TechnologySame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207