MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415440737 · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000837

Heterogeneous effects of physical activity on physiological stress during pregnancy

2025· article· en· W4415440737 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jenifer Rim, Qi Xu, Xiwei Tang, Tamara Jimah, Yuqing Guo, Annie Qu

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Digital Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Science FoundationDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary
KeywordsPhysical activitymHealthPregnancyModerationPsychological interventionHeart rate variabilityAssociation (psychology)Stress measuresDistress

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pregnancy is a critical period characterized by profound physiological and psychological adaptations that can significantly impact both maternal and fetal health outcomes. Thus, it is imperative to implement targeted and evidence-based interventions to enhance maternal well-being during the prenatal period. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies enable continuous, real-time monitoring of both physiological and psychological states, providing detailed insights into health behaviors and individual responses in natural settings. This study leveraged mHealth technologies, including the Oura smart ring and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) via a mobile app, to examine how emotional distress influences the relationship between physical activity (PA) and heart rate variability (HRV), an indicator of physiological stress during pregnancy. Consenting participants, aged 18-40 years, with a healthy singleton pregnancy in the second trimester, were enrolled in the study. Our findings revealed that among participants experiencing emotional distress, increased PA was associated with higher HRV, indicating lower physiological stress. In particular, this beneficial effect was more pronounced on days with elevated emotional distress. These findings suggest that engaging in physical activity may help protect pregnant women against autonomic dysregulation associated with emotional distress, potentially supporting maternal cardiovascular health. By utilizing mHealth technologies for real-time data collection, our study highlights the potential for personalized and adaptive interventions that promote maternal well-being by encouraging physical activity as a strategy to mitigate the physiological effects of emotional distress during pregnancy. Author summary Pregnancy involves significant physiological and psychological changes that impact maternal and fetal health. Heart rate variability (HRV), a key biomarker of autonomic function and cardiovascular health, reflects the body’s ability to regulate physiological stress. In this study, we used mobile health (mHealth) technologies, including the Oura smart ring and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) through a mobile app, to examine how emotional distress influences the relationship between physical activity (PA) and HRV during pregnancy. Our findings indicate that PA protects against autonomic dysregulation linked to emotional distress. On days with emotional distress, engaging in more PA was associated with higher HRV, indicating lower physiological stress. This positive effect was even stronger on days with increased emotional distress. By leveraging real-time monitoring, our study highlights the value of mHealth in capturing dynamic interactions between emotional and physiological states. These insights demonstrate the potential for personalized interventions using mHealth technologies to support maternal well-being by encouraging PA as a strategy to better manage physiological stress during pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLOS Digital Health→Same topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum→French-language works237,207→