MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415446749 · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1446

TCT-1221 ReTAVI Registry: Early Outcomes of Redo-TAVI with SAPIEN Platform in a Real-World Prospective Cohort

2025· article· en· W4415446749 on OpenAlexaff
Giuseppe Tarantini, Luca Nai Fovino, Héctor Alvarez Covarrubias, Rafał Wolny, Tommaso Fabris, Joanna Nawara-Skipirzepa, Matthias Eden, José Luis Zamorano Gómez, Michael Joner, Thomas Cuisset, Victoria Delgado, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Francesco Saia, Gintautas Bieliauskas, Éric Van Belle, Thomas Modine, Tobias Rheude, Philippe Garot, Christian Jung, Tanja K. Rudolph, Lionel Leroux, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Thomas Nestelberger, Thibault Lhermusier, Mohammed Nejjari, Ander Regueiro, David Meier, Chiara Fraccaro, Tau Hartikainen, Nicole Karam, Martin J. Swaans, José A. Rodrigues, Henryk Dreger, Christian Hengstenberg, Sarah Mauler‐Wittwer, Nicolò Piazza, Nicolas Combaret, Vincent Letocart, Vincent Auffret, Éric Durand, Marina Ureña, A A Drago, Marco De Carlo, Víctor Alfonso Jiménez Díaz, Maciej Dabrowski, Julia Mascherbauer, Arnaud Sudre, Birgid Gonska, Massimo Mancone, Enrico Fabris, Rui Campante Teles, Luis Nombela‐Franco, Lluís Asmarats, Victòria Vilalta, Marcin Protasiewicz, John G. Webb, Gábor Tóth, Andreas Zierer, Gilles Rioufol, Moritz Seiffert, Marianna Adamo, Francesco Meucci, Alfonso Ielasi, Francesco Burzotta, María Francisca López, Itamar Loewenstein, Paweł Kralisz, Jacek Legutko, Zenon Huczek, Andrea Pavei, Radka Rakova, W.A. Wesselink, Marie Zielinski, Daniel Greinert, Nataliya I. Trushina, L. Zimmermann, Peter Bramlage, Radosław Parma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProspective cohort studyCohortCohort studyMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of Cardiology→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→