MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415449007 · doi:10.1177/0310057x251364278

Do not stop teaching anaesthesia trainees direct laryngoscopy

2025· article· en· W4415449007 on OpenAlex
Anthony M.‐H. Ho, Glenio B. Mizubuti, Daenis Camiré, Jordan Leitch, Tracy Cupido, Saam Azargive, Cian Hurley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia and Intensive Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAirway Management and Intubation Techniques
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaryngoscopyEndotracheal intubationIntubationLaryngoscopesTracheal intubationAnesthesiologyPrimary care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Videolaryngoscopy is superior to direct laryngoscopy in difficult intubation and is quicker to master. Some anaesthesiologists have advocated for videolaryngoscopy as the primary tool for endotracheal intubation. We argue that while prioritising videolaryngoscopy allows earlier success and skill retention for novices and doctors who only occasionally intubate, anaesthesiology residents must achieve proficiency in both techniques since not only do they have ample opportunity, but there are situations in which direct laryngoscopy can be either a rescue or even the primary technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it