MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415450427 · doi:10.1016/j.aimed.2025.100586

Extended reality in acupuncture-related research and practice: A bibliometric analysis

2025· article· en· W4415450427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jing He

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Integrative Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJiangsu Commission of Health
KeywordsBibliometricsMental healthField (mathematics)CitationWeb of scienceImpact factorCitation analysisCore (optical fiber)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the application of extended reality (XR) technology in acupuncture-related research and practice has gained increasing popularity. This article aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis in this field. Publications between 1996 and 2024 in this field were searched in Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. Software used for data preprocessing and analysis included Microsoft Excel, RStudio, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer. A total of 143 articles were selected. Publications in this field were increasing rapidly. The top three countries by publication volume were China, the United States and Canada. The top three most-cited countries were the United States, Belgium and China. The overall cooperation network was loose and mainly dominated by China, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The top three affiliations by publication volume were University of Toronto, Emory University, and Southern Medical University. KU Leuven had the highest total and average citations. The author with the most publications and total citations was Moseley G. The source with the most publications was Frontiers in Neurology, whereas the top cited source was Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Hatem SM (Front Hum Neurosci, 2016) was the top cited publication with the highest average annual citation rate. The most frequent keywords included “virtual reality”, “acupuncture”, “cognitive behavioral therapy”, “stroke” and “pain”. Keyword clusters mainly focused on three aspects: neurological rehabilitation, mental health and pain management. An isolated sub-cluster existed in mental health cluster with “simulation” as its core keyword. As a specialized domain, the field is expected to progress by forging a more direct integration of XR with acupuncture and a deeper convergence of basic science and clinical practice, indicating substantial progress in the future. • XR use in acupuncture-related area has grown for nearly three decades. • While most studies kept XR and acupuncture separate, few integrated them directly. • Key research areas are neurorehabilitation, mental health, and pain management. • A mental health sub-cluster indicated a gap between technology and application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Bibliometrics
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0900.235
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.540
Teacher spread0.466 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Integrative MedicineSame topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207