MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415450553 · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102190

Evaluating the impact of a School Streets intervention on personal vehicle use and air quality: Pilot studies at four suburban schools in Canada

2025· article· en· W4415450553 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kerstyn L. Lutz, Amanda Norton, Matthew D. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport & Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsGeneral Electric (Canada)
FundersUniversity of Toronto Mississauga
KeywordsPsychological interventionClosing (real estate)StakeholderIntervention (counseling)MorningAir pollutionPublic transport

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Active School Transportation (AST) has declined globally, coinciding with increased personal vehicle use. School Streets interventions aim to reverse this trend by temporarily closing streets adjacent to schools during drop-off and pick-up times to promote AST and reduce vehicle use while offering additional benefits like improved air quality. While grey literature suggests effectiveness, rigorous evaluations are lacking. This study examined School Streets at four suburban schools in two Canadian cities, where implementation strategies differed. Changes in personal vehicle use were assessed through vehicle counts, while traffic, emissions, and dispersion models estimated fluctuations in vehicle emissions and related ambient air pollution. Results showed School Streets reduced personal vehicle use by 35 %, vehicle emissions by 31 %, and related ambient air pollution by 93 %. However, post-intervention reductions fell to 5 %, suggesting that the benefits are primarily constrained to the days when School Streets are active. Effectiveness varied by implementation strategy. In the city where a cross-disciplinary team was involved, benefits were greater, suggesting broader stakeholder engagement may enhance impact. In the city where the school board led implementation, effects were more sustained, highlighting the value of school-driven leadership. Afternoon-only interventions were less effective in the morning but equally or more effective in the afternoon. Closing only drop-off and pick-up areas was less impactful than restricting a larger street section. Morning reductions were larger, likely due to higher initial vehicle volumes, while afternoon reductions were more sustainable, likely reflecting students’ increased likelihood of walking home. These findings highlight School Streets' potential to reduce vehicle use and emissions, emphasizing the need for strategic implementation and stakeholder involvement. • School Streets reduced vehicle use by 35 %, vehicle emissions by 31 %, and related ambient air pollution by 93 %. • Post-intervention reductions in vehicle use, emissions, and air pollution were more modest (5 %). • Greater benefits were observed with cross-disciplinary teams, highlighting the value of broad stakeholder involvement. • Interventions led by school boards showed more sustained effects, emphasizing the importance of school-driven leadership. • Morning reductions in vehicle use were larger, while afternoon reductions were more sustainable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transport & HealthSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207