MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415450651 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.664

SUN-711 Clinical Presenting Features, Biochemical, Radiological, and Genetic Characteristics of Four Male Patients with Osteopetrosis from a Canadian Tertiary Center.

2025· article· en· W4415450651 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dalal S. Ali, Maria Luisa Brandi, Aliya Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteopetrosisBone painMedullary cavityOsteosclerosisBone marrowPancytopeniaPelvisSkeletal surveyBone diseaseMetacarpal bones

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: M.H. Alabdely: None. D.S. Ali: None. M. Brandi: None. A.A. Khan: None. Background: Osteopetrosis (OPT) is a rare bone disease associated with decreased osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. OPT is caused by various mutations which may be due to autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or x-linked recessive forms. OPT can cause fragility fractures, spinal cord compression, hydrocephalus, and cranial nerve entrapment. A decrease in the bone marrow space leads to pancytopenia and extra medullary hematopoiesis with hepatosplenomegaly. Hearing impairment, mandibular osteomyelitis and osteoarthritis may also occur. Pathological fractures of long bones may occur due to bone sclerosis. Infantile OPT is treated with bone marrow transplant, while adults receive supportive care. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of all patients at our Canadian Bone Research and Education Centre to identify the presenting features of OPT in our patient population. Results: We identified four males with OPT, mean age 50 years, diagnosed with OPT. Three patients (75%) were diagnosed incidentally with imaging and high bone mineral density (BMD). Bone pain was present in 75% of patients. Fragility fractures, decreased vision, hearing impairment, osteoarthritis, headache, and dizziness were present in 25%. No dental, or hematological abnormalities were observed. Two patients had a diffusely sclerotic appearance of the axial skeleton. One patient had sclerotic changes of the spine suggestive of rugger jersey spine and bony sclerosis affecting the entire pelvis and other ribs. Low vitamin D was found in 50%. One patient had elevated 24-hour urine calcium, and another had high alkaline phosphatase level. Two patients have family history of OPT or high BMD. Genetic testing revealed two likely pathogenic heterozygous variants in the CLCN7 gene (c.2332-1G>A and c.869C>T,p.Ser290Phe) previously reported in the literature. Additionally, novel heterozygous VUS variants in PLEKHM1 gene c.100G>A(p.Val34Met) and OSTM1 gene c.313A>G(p.Ser105Gly) were identified amongst the genes associated with OPT in one patient. We also identified a novel heterozygous VUS variant in the CLCN7 gene c.2335delG(p.Val779Serfs*4) associated with AD OPT type2. One patient received IV zoledronate, while the others received supportive care. Conclusion: We present four males with OPT. The presenting clinical features most noted were bone pain being the most prevalent symptom (75%), other clinical features included vision and hearing impairment, headaches, osteoarthritis, and fragility fractures, each occurring in 25% of cases. The one patient with a fragility fracture was treated with IV zoledronate, while the others received supportive care. Genetic testing identified likely pathogenic variants in the CLCN7 gene in 50% of cases. Additionally, we discovered three novel variants in CLCN7, PLEKHM1, and OSTM1 that could be pathogenic. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine Society→Same topicBone health and treatments→French-language works237,207→