MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415450765 · doi:10.32370/ia_2025_03_7

Analytical Algorithm for Monitoring the Readiness of Smart Technologies

2025· article· W4415450765 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ksenia Kaplieva

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEconomic and Technological Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncryptionCoding (social sciences)Context (archaeology)Identification (biology)Production (economics)Source codeInformation technologyEfficient energy useControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of modern smart manufacturing, a patent and licensing strategy is formed as a control analytical algorithm for monitoring the technology's readiness for mass production and integrated marketing. New smart manufacturing solutions have a positive impact on the development of most production systems and equipment. Their efficiency is enhanced through vertical and horizontal integration. The proposed technical solutions are based on a method of coding and subsequent identification of the coding element. The method involves applying a special coating (or its technological equivalent) to an object and measuring its thickness. Matching the parameters with the specified code ensures positive identification, while mismatching leads to shutdown or blocking of the equipment or information consumer. This technology has been repeatedly proven in film thickness control applications in solar energy and semiconductor manufacturing. With the advent of multilayer optical discs and recording formats using blue lasers, its importance has increased. Coding at each recording level enables three-dimensional local encryption of information, making the technology particularly relevant for protecting classified and confidential data. In conclusion, it should be noted that new smart manufacturing technologies have a positive impact on the comprehensive development of virtually any production systems and equipment, as well as on their improvement through vertical and horizontal integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellectual ArchiveSame topicEconomic and Technological Systems AnalysisFrench-language works237,207