MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415451473 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.1742

OR15-06 Steroids, stress and body mass index interact to accelerate female pubertal development

2025· article· en· W4415451473 on OpenAlexaff
Lauren C. Houghton, Wei Yin, Stefan A. Wudy, Michaela F. Hartmann, Frank Z. Stanczyk, Julia A. Knight, Irene L. Andrulis, Angela R. Bradbury, Lisa A. Schwartz, Saundra Buys, Mary B. Daly, John Esther, Wendy Chung, Regina M. Santella, Russell D. Romeo, Mary Beth Terry

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenarcheBody mass indexHazard ratioBreast developmentConfoundingHormoneConfidence intervalAnthropometryMetabolome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: L.C. Houghton: None. Y. Wei: None. S.A. Wudy: None. M. Hartmann: None. F.Z. Stanczyk: None. J. Knight: None. I. Andrulis: None. A. Bradbury: None. L. Schwartz: None. S. Buys: None. M. Daly: None. E. John: None. W. Chung: None. R. Santella: None. R.D. Romeo: None. M. Terry: None. Background: There are ongoing concerns about declining age of puberty in females and what is driving the decline. We aimed to identify patterns in the hormonal steroid metabolome associated with accelerated pubertal development in girls, and to determine if this association was modified by body mass index (BMI), markers of stress, and breast cancer family history. We hypothesized that higher androgens and glucocorticoids are associated with accelerated pubertal timing, and this acceleration would be further increased in girls with elevated BMI and stress. We further hypothesized that the stress response changes during the pubertal window. Methods: In the LEGACY Girls Study, we measured 36 metabolites of glucocorticoids, androgens, progesterone, and estrogens in two urine specimens collected before (pre, n=327) and during puberty (pubertal, n=115). Parents assessed the age at onset of breast development (thelarche) through the Pubertal Development Scale. Girls aged ≥10 years self-reported age at menarche. Study staff measured participants’ height and weight and administered questionnaires including the Internalizing Composite Scale (a parent proxy of child stress). We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between a doubling in steroid metabolites (μg/mL per mg of creatinine) and age at thelarche, pubarche and menarche using Weibull survival models, testing for interactions with stress BMI z-scores, and family history using cross-product terms. Results: Higher pre-pubertal levels of urinary metabolites of glucocorticoids (HR=1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.5), androgens (HR=3.9, 95%CI 2.7-5.6) and progesterone (HR=6.7, 95%CI 4.1-10.9) were associated with accelerated thelarche. Higher pre-pubertal (HR=0.2, 95%CI 0.1-0.5) and pubertal (HR=0.4, 95%CI 0.2-0.9) levels of estrogen metabolites were associated with delayed menarche. Higher levels of pubertal androgen (HR=0.3, 95%CI 0.1-0.8) and progesterone (HR=0.2, 95%CI 0.07-0.7) metabolites were associated with longer pubertal tempo. Girls with high glucocorticoid metabolites, BMI (≥15.6 kg/m2) and stress (≥ 46) reached thelarche 7 months earlier than girls with low glucocorticoid metabolites, BMI (<15.6 kg/m2) and stress (<46). There were no interactions with family history. Conclusion: Elevated metabolites of glucocorticoids, androgens and progesterone are associated with accelerated pubertal onset, and BMI and stress modify this association. Previous studies have focused on estrogens, menarche and BMI; our results suggest that androgens and stress impact the timing of thelarche with implications for our understanding of pubertal development. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207