MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415453592 · doi:10.5539/jel.v14n6p488

Creative Leadership Program Development for Secondary School Teachers Under the Provincial Organization in the Northeast Region of Thailand

2025· article· W4415453592 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Piriyaporn Butsirimongkol, Suwat Julsuwan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education and Learning · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicCompetency Development and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData collectionConfirmatory factor analysisInstructional leadershipEducational leadershipDescriptive statisticsContent analysisCreativityProgram evaluationLeadership development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aimed to develop and evaluate a creative leadership program for secondary school teachers under Provincial Administrative Organizations in Northeastern Thailand. Employing a comprehensive research and development methodology, the study proceeded through three sequential phases. In Phase 1, we analyzed the components of creative leadership through content analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, collecting data from 700 and 500 teachers respectively. Phase 2 involved developing the creative leadership program by synthesizing program design literature and conducting a connoisseurship seminar with seven experts to evaluate its appropriateness and feasibility. In Phase 3, we implemented the program with 33 teachers and assessed its effectiveness. Data collection instruments included questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and evaluation forms, with analysis conducted using descriptive statistics. Results revealed three distinct creative leadership components comprising 11 indicators: 1) Imagination (creative thinking, sense of humor, knowledge, and creative problem-solving); 2) Vision (vision creation, vision implementation, and vision dissemination); and 3) Divergent Thinking Skills (originality, fluency, flexibility, and elaboration). The developed program integrated five essential elements: theoretical principles, measurable objectives, three content modules corresponding to the identified components, a Three-Dimensional Development Model focusing on knowledge, practice, and reflection dimensions, and comprehensive evaluation methods. Implementation results demonstrated that teachers’ creative leadership behaviors increased significantly from “high” to “very high” levels, with program satisfaction rated at the “highest” level, confirming the program’s effectiveness for enhancing creative leadership capabilities among secondary school teachers in transitional educational contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education and LearningSame topicCompetency Development and EvaluationFrench-language works237,207