Creative Leadership Program Development for Secondary School Teachers Under the Provincial Organization in the Northeast Region of Thailand
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aimed to develop and evaluate a creative leadership program for secondary school teachers under Provincial Administrative Organizations in Northeastern Thailand. Employing a comprehensive research and development methodology, the study proceeded through three sequential phases. In Phase 1, we analyzed the components of creative leadership through content analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, collecting data from 700 and 500 teachers respectively. Phase 2 involved developing the creative leadership program by synthesizing program design literature and conducting a connoisseurship seminar with seven experts to evaluate its appropriateness and feasibility. In Phase 3, we implemented the program with 33 teachers and assessed its effectiveness. Data collection instruments included questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and evaluation forms, with analysis conducted using descriptive statistics. Results revealed three distinct creative leadership components comprising 11 indicators: 1) Imagination (creative thinking, sense of humor, knowledge, and creative problem-solving); 2) Vision (vision creation, vision implementation, and vision dissemination); and 3) Divergent Thinking Skills (originality, fluency, flexibility, and elaboration). The developed program integrated five essential elements: theoretical principles, measurable objectives, three content modules corresponding to the identified components, a Three-Dimensional Development Model focusing on knowledge, practice, and reflection dimensions, and comprehensive evaluation methods. Implementation results demonstrated that teachers’ creative leadership behaviors increased significantly from “high” to “very high” levels, with program satisfaction rated at the “highest” level, confirming the program’s effectiveness for enhancing creative leadership capabilities among secondary school teachers in transitional educational contexts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it