MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415455497 · doi:10.3397/in_2025_1074280

Finite element modeling of metamaterial made of acoustic black hole profiles for achieving broadband sound absorption.

2025· article· en· W4415455497 on OpenAlexaff
Zacharie Laly, Raymond Panneton, Noureddine Atalla, Sebastian Ghinet, Kévin Verdière

Bibliographic record

VenueNOISE-CON proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandRADIUSAttenuation coefficientAbsorption (acoustics)Noise reduction coefficientFinite element methodMetamaterialFrequency band

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To achieve broadband sound absorption, acoustic metamaterial composed of periodically arranged thin annular cavities, separated by rings and connected through a main central pore is studied using finite element method. The geometry of the main pore is varied by applying different decreasing hole profile functions. Each annular cavity has a thickness of 1 mm, and the radius of the rings decreases progressively from the inlet, following linear, exponential, quadratic and sinusoidal decay functions. Considering up to 40 annular cavities, each main pore profile results in a broad frequency band of sound absorption coefficient. The exponential pore profile exhibits five absorption peaks below 1200 Hz and an average absorption coefficient of about 0.9 above 2000 Hz. In contrast, the other pore profiles achieve an average sound absorption coefficient of about 0.98 above 1500 Hz. As the radius of the inlet ring decreases, the sound absorption coefficient and the frequency band decrease. The studied metamaterial is suitable for various applications aimed at reducing broadband noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNOISE-CON proceedingsSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207