MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415464346 · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64429-4

Temperature-dependent dynamic disproportionation in LiNiO2

2025· article· en· W4415464346 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrey D. Poletayev, Robert J. Green, Jack E. N. Swallow, Lijin An, Leanne A. H. Jones, Grant Harris, Peter Bencok, Ronny Sutarto, Jonathon Cottom, Benjamin J. Morgan, Robert A. House, Robert S. Weatherup, M. Saiful Islam

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionResearch Councils UKRoyal SocietyRoyal Academy of EngineeringDiamond Light SourceUK Research and InnovationCanadian Light Source
KeywordsDisproportionationMultipletIonLithium (medication)Ab initioAb initio quantum chemistry methodsNickelElectronic structureOxide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nickelate materials offer diverse functionalities for energy and computing applications. Lithium nickel oxide (LiNiO 2 ) is an archetypal layered nickelate, but the electronic structure of this correlated material is not yet fully understood. Here we investigate the temperature-dependent speciation and spin dynamics of Ni ions in LiNiO 2 . Ab initio simulations predict that Ni ions disproportionate into three states, which dynamically interconvert and whose populations vary with temperature. These predictions are verified using x-ray absorption spectroscopy, x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, and resonant inelastic x-ray scattering at the Ni L 3,2 -edge. Charge-transfer multiplet calculations consistent with disproportionation reproduce all experimental features. Our results support a model of dynamic disproportionation that explains diverse physical observations of LiNiO 2 , including magnetometry, thermally activated electronic conduction, diffractometry, core-level spectroscopies, and the stability of ubiquitous antisite defects. This unified understanding of the material properties of LiNiO 2 is important for applications of nickelate materials as battery cathodes, catalysts, and superconductors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207