MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415464880 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-4588

A decade of winter supraglacial lake drainage across Northeast Greenland using C-band SAR

2025· article· en· W4415464880 on OpenAlexafffund
Connor Wolfgang Dean, Randall K. Scharien, Ian Willis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDrainageMeltwaterSnowDrainage basinGreenland ice sheetSynthetic aperture radarSatelliteCryosphereGlacier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. This study presents a comprehensive, multi-year assessment of winter supraglacial lake drainages on the Northeast Greenland Ice Sheet, detailing cascading drainage events, examining links to melt-season conditions, and evaluating their potential impact on ice dynamics. Supraglacial lakes can drain rapidly, delivering meltwater to the ice-sheet bed, increasing basal water pressure, reducing friction, and accelerating ice flow. Such drainage events are well-documented across Greenland during the melt season using optical satellite imagery. Recent studies using satellite and airborne radar data reveal that many supraglacial lakes persist beyond summer and may also drain during winter, potentially affecting ice dynamics in a manner similar to melt-season drainages. Here, we use C-band synthetic aperture radar imagery from Sentinel-1 and RADARSAT Constellation Mission spanning ten consecutive winters (2014/2015–2023/2024), to detect winter lake drainages. We develop a normalization method to integrate images from varying acquisition geometries, enabling high-temporal-resolution monitoring. Our analysis identifies 90 winter drainage events from 55 unique lakes, exhibiting substantial interannual variability – from a maximum of 18 events in winter 2018/2019 to a minimum of four events in both 2020/2021 and 2021/2022. Drainages occurred most frequently in early winter, with decreasing frequency as winter progressed. Approximately half of the observed drainages were part of 13 cascading events, each involving two to seven lakes over distances up to ~33 km. Comparisons with preceding melt-season conditions reveal negative correlations between winter drainage frequency and both melt-season intensity and melt-season drainage frequency. Ice velocity analyses over the ten-year period show no sustained seasonal or annual increases attributable to winter drainages, although isolated short-term increases (6–12-day) were observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→