Detecting the location of pain by transferring its sensation from a person to a another one by EM waves in BBI technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients in a coma are unable to express their problems, including pain. Therefore, it is necessary to examine their feelings, including pain and its location, in a reliable manner. This research presents a novel method for transmitting feelings and pain between two individuals through the exchange of waves. The method involves designing an antenna that captures the patient's blood waves, amplifies them, and transmits them to the blood of a healthy person. This antenna is composed of materials such as copper, iron, magnetic generators, ionized liquids, and blood from animals like rabbits. Blood molecules, such as hemoglobin, which contain oxygen and iron, exchange information with cells and sensory stimuli, such as neurons, by receiving and emitting spin waves. These waves are then transmitted to biological antennas and the blood of the second person. Consequently, the healthy individual can perceive the patient's pain and determine its location. Prior to the transfer process, the voltage at various points on the bodies of both the patient and the healthy person is analyzed and simulated using computer models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".