MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Combined Immunotherapy of Dual-Targeted CAR NK Cells and Modified Oncolytic Virus Against Glioblastoma

2025· article· W4415469677 on OpenAlexaff
Haoran Du, Xiaoheng Zhang, Shuhao Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueTheoretical and Natural Science · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncolytic virusImmunotherapyChimeric antigen receptorTumor microenvironmentChemokineImmune systemGlioblastomaVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive and treatment-resistant brain tumor with limited therapeutic options. This study explores a novel combined immunotherapy approach using dual-targeted CAR NK cells and a modified oncolytic virus (OV) to enhance anti-tumor efficacy. The CAR NK cells are engineered to target IL13Rα2 and CD19, while also incorporating IL6, IL21, and together with constitutively active STAT3 signalling to boost persistence and activity. The OV, derived from herpes simplex virus (HSV-1), is designed to express CD19 and the chemokine CCL5, facilitating NK cell recruitment and tumor targeting. Combined therapy in immunodeficient and immunocompetent mouse models shows significant tumor regression, prolonged survival, and increased immune cell infiltration compared to monotherapies. These results highlight the potential of this dual-mechanism strategy to overcome GBM’s immunosuppressive microenvironment and heterogeneity. However, challenges such as off-target effects on healthy B cells and testicular tissue warrant further investigation. This study provides a promising foundation for advancing combined CAR NK and OV therapies against GBM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheoretical and Natural ScienceSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207