MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415474237 · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000002475

Fenestrating Adenocarcinoma

2025· article· en· W4415474237 on OpenAlexaff
Dhuha Al‐Sajee, Lisa M. Rooper, Justin A. Bishop, Diana Bell, Snjezana Doğan, Bin Xu, Lina Chen, Tra Truong, Stephen J. Smith, Xu‐Chao Zhang, Yuan-Dong Zhang, Elan Hahn, Brendan C. Dickson, Abbas Agaimy, Anand Rajan, Christopher M. K. L. Yao, Andrew M. Bellizzi, Ilan Weinreb

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharynxAdenocarcinomaLymph nodeSalivary glandTongueOral cavity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most salivary gland tumors are found to have genetic fusions driving their oncogenesis, with an explosion of such findings in recent years. They typically represent previously identified and well-characterized tumors and the fusions are generally not necessary for diagnosis but rather serve as diagnostic arbitrators in challenging cases. That said, occasional unexpected molecular findings are broadening our understanding of these common tumors and have led to the emergence of new entities, some of which were "hiding in plain sight" and are quite common, like secretory carcinoma. In contrast, others are sufficiently rare that molecular testing was required to identify them in small cohorts, combining cases from multiple institutions, such as microcribriform adenocarcinoma. Recently, we identified a rare case of tongue adenocarcinoma with EWSR1::BEND2 fusion with an unusual morphology, and 2 additional cases were subsequently briefly reported in the literature. In this study, we collected and analyzed a total of 7 cases that show variable but consistent morphology, including a fenestrating glandular appearance, occasional squamous or basaloid growth, and focal mucinous cells. The tumors showed a predilection for the pharynx with 4 cases in the base of the tongue, one case in the tonsil/oropharyngeal wall, one case in the nasopharynx, and only one nonpharyngeal case in the trachea. No oral cavity or major salivary gland tumors were found with this set of findings to date. The tumors showed some aggressive tendencies, with 2/4 with follow-up information having adverse outcomes, including lymph node metastases in 2 cases and 1 of these cases also having brain metastases, recurrence, and death from disease. All cases tested showed EWSR1::BEND2 fusion by NGS, as well as CK7/BEND2 positivity, and S100 negativity by immunohistochemistry. The tumors showed variable p63 staining depending on whether squamous or basaloid features were present. A tissue microarray (TMA) stained with an antibody directed against the BEND2 protein showed no significant staining in any other salivary tumor type. The constellation of findings in this cohort is highly suggestive of a specific entity, and we propose the appellation "Fenestrating Adenocarcinoma (FAC)" of the salivary gland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207