MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415475635 · doi:10.25074/0196318.39.2935

Deconstrucción del privilegio y la opresión: núcleo patriarcal en la teoría feminista

2025· article· W4415475635 on OpenAlex
Javier Trejo Tabares

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de la Academia · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomain (mathematical analysis)Spectral analysisContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo se propone analizar el cuestionamiento por los fundamentos epistemológicos del feminismo y la teoría feminista desde una metodología de análisis del discurso y un ejercicio de deconstrucción, con el fin de esclarecer la relación entre la no opresión y el no privilegio como núcleo del feminismo; y la opresión y el privilegio como nucleo del machismo, respectivamente. Se presenta la definición de feminismo como estructura de la comprensión, la cual alberga la diversidad de discursos que puedan enunciarse, y se expresa posteriormente como estructura de la explicación.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it