La restauración patriarcal como proyecto político: fronteras de género, familia y nación
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo reflexiona críticamente sobre el escenario actual de restauración patriarcal como parte de una ofensiva conservadora de escala global. En un contexto de repliegue se propone una pausa analítica que permita interrogar los contornos del giro autoritario contemporáneo. A partir de una revisión documental y bibliográfica, y desde una implicación situada en los feminismos latinoamericanos, se analizan las formas en que se reactualizan jerarquías de género, raza y clase mediante discursos antigénero, refuerzos del familismo, exaltación de nuevos modelos de feminidad y masculinidad, y restauración del binarismo sexual. El texto sostiene que la reacción patriarcal actual no constituye una simple respuesta a los avances feministas, sino un proyecto político estructurado que busca reinstalar un orden afectivo, sexual y nacional frente a las crisis múltiples que atraviesan nuestras sociedades. Finalmente, se reivindica la importancia de sostener la memoria feminista y popular como herramienta de resistencia y legado para las luchas futuras, afirmando la necesidad de imaginar otros horizontes más allá de la restauración.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".