MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415477053 · doi:10.5194/hess-29-5695-2025

Impact of bias adjustment strategy on ensemble projections of hydrological extremes

2025· article· en· W4415477053 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Paul C. Astagneau, Raul R. Wood, Mathieu Vrac, Sven Kotlarski, Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Bastien François, Manuela I. Brunner

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrology and earth system sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBundesamt für UmweltBayerisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und VerbraucherschutzEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaBayerische Akademie der WissenschaftenLeibniz-GemeinschaftAgence Nationale de la RechercheLeibniz-RechenzentrumUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsUnivariateClimate changeStreamflowBivariate analysisPrecipitationClimate modelRobustness (evolution)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrological climate change impact studies typically rely on hydrological projections generated by hydrological models driven with bias-adjusted climate simulations. Such hydrological projections are influenced by internal climate variability, which can mask the emergence of robust climate trends. To account for internal variability in climate projections, single-model initial-condition large ensembles (SMILEs) can be employed. SMILEs are generated by running a single global/regional climate model many times with slightly perturbed initial conditions. However, it remains challenging to select an appropriate bias adjustment strategy for SMILEs used in hydrological impact studies because of the relative importance of inter-variable dependence and the preservation of both climate variability and the change signal. To facilitate such selection, we here compare different bias adjustment strategies applied to SMILEs and their effect on hydrological impact assessments. Specifically, we investigate how climate and hydrological extremes change for 87 catchments in the Swiss Alps when using (a) univariate vs. bivariate, (b) ensemble vs. individual-member, and (c) change-preserving vs. non-change-preserving bias adjustment methods. To do so, we adjust the biases of a 50-member SMILE with the different adjustment methods and drive a hydrological model to simulate and project high and low flows. Our comparison shows (1) no clear benefits from using bivariate instead of univariate bias adjustment methods when the SMILE already efficiently simulates the dependence between temperature and precipitation and (2) that the choice of using ensemble vs. individual-member and change-preserving vs. non-change-preserving bias adjustments leads to large differences in the values of signal robustness indicators, including temperature, precipitation and streamflow signal-to-noise ratios and streamflow and precipitation time-of-emergence. These influences need to be considered when selecting an appropriate bias adjustment strategy for a given application. Based on our comparison, we generally recommend to apply change-preserving and ensemble bias adjustment methods in future hydrological impact studies using SMILEs. Further research is needed to improve bias adjustment methods that preserve both the signal and the variability of ensemble climate projections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrology and earth system sciencesSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207