MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415477154 · doi:10.1094/phytofr-08-25-0079-r

Determining the Optimal Timing and Economic Return of Corn Fungicide Applications Using a Network Meta-Analysis

2025· article· en· W4415477154 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nabin K. Dangal, Maria Oros, June C. Lo, Isaac Baumann, Damon L. Smith, Thomas Wesley Allen, Alyssa K. Betts, Mandy Bish, Kaitlyn Bissonnette, Emmanuel Byamukama, Adam M. Byrne, Martin I. Chilvers, Travis Faske, Andrew Friskop, Tamra A. Jackson‐Ziems, Heather Kelly, Nathan M. Kleczewski, David B. Langston, Austin McCoy, Daren S. Mueller, Rodrigo Onofre, Paul P. Price, Alison E. Robertson, Edward J. Sikora, Darcy E. P. Telenko, Albert Tenuta, Kiersten Wise

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoFrontiers™ · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
FundersAgricultural Research ServiceNational Institute of Food and AgricultureArkansas Corn and Grain Sorghum BoardIndiana Corn Marketing CouncilGrain Farmers of Ontario
KeywordsFungicideYield (engineering)Disease controlChlorothalonilPesticide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of fungicides in reducing disease and protecting yield in corn. Uniform protocols were designed to test the efficacy of 12 widely available corn fungicides applied at one of the following timings: in-furrow with the seed at planting, applied 5.1 cm to the side and 5.1 cm below the seed at planting, 10 to 12 leaves with a visible collar, tasseling to silking (VT/R1), or milk stage. A total of 152 trials were conducted across 18 states in the United States and Ontario, Canada, from 2019 to 2022. Studies were analyzed using network meta-analyses to determine the fungicide efficacy and expected yield benefit of individual products compared with a nontreated control (NTC). All fungicides significantly reduced disease severity compared with the NTC ( P < 0.001), and all fungicides resulted in greater yields compared with the NTC, except for Xyway LFR. Final disease severity influenced yield effect size, with fungicide application resulting in a greater yield effect size when final disease severity exceeded 5%. Fungicide application timing also influenced yield effect size, with fungicides applied at VT/R1 resulting in significantly lower disease (–7.6%) compared with the NTC. The yield effect size was typically greater in studies with the fungicide applied at VT/R1 compared with applications occurring at planting. Economic analyses concluded that expected net benefits were positive for all fungicides tested except for Delaro Complete and Xyway LFR. Most fungicides resulted in greater breakeven probabilities with increasing disease severity. The results emphasize that fungicide applications occurring at VT/R1 and when disease severity exceeds 5% are more likely to result in a positive economic gain. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.040
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoFrontiers™Same topicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlFrench-language works237,207