Sleep and Activity Patterns as Transdiagnostic Behavioral Biomarkers in Psychiatry: Longitudinal Observational Study From the DeeP-DD Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Despite widespread use of symptom rating scales in psychiatry, these tools are limited by reliance on self-report, infrequent administration, and lack of predictive power. This constrains clinicians' ability to monitor illness trajectories or anticipate adverse outcomes like relapse. Actigraphy, a passive wearable-based method for measuring sleep and physical activity, offers objective, high-resolution behavioral data that may better reflect symptom fluctuations. Prior research has shown associations between actigraphy features and mood or psychosis symptoms, but most studies have focused on narrow diagnostic groups or fixed time windows, limiting clinical translation. Objective: This study aims to examine whether actigraphy-derived sleep and activity features correlate with psychiatric symptom severity in a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample, and to identify which features are most clinically relevant across multiple temporal resolutions. Methods: We present a feasibility case series study analyzing preliminary data from 8 outpatients (ages 18-52 years) enrolled in the Deep Phenotyping and Digitalization at Douglas (DeeP-DD) study, a prospective transdiagnostic study of digital phenotyping. Participants wore wrist-based actigraphy devices (GENEActiv) for up to 5 months. Symptom severity was measured using a variety of self- and clinician-rated scales. We performed intraindividual Spearman correlations and interindividual repeated measures correlations across daily, weekly, monthly, and full-duration averages. Results: Intraindividual analyses revealed that later rise times were significantly associated with higher weekly 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores in participant 7 (ρ=0.74, P<.001) and participant 4 (ρ=0.78, P=.02), as well as higher weekly 7-item General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scores in participant 7 (ρ=0.59, P=.03). While similar trends were observed at daily and monthly timescales, the weekly resolution yielded the most robust significance. Interindividual analyses showed that weeks with later average rise time correlated with higher PHQ-9 (r=0.48, P<.001) and GAD-7 scores (r=0.38, P=.03), with the PHQ-9 association remaining significant after Bonferroni correction (Bonferroni-corrected P=.02). Increased light physical activity was linked to lower PHQ-9 scores weekly (r=-0.44, P=.001) and monthly (r=-0.53, P=.01). Over the whole duration of the study, increased levels of sedentary activity were associated with lower GAD-7 scores (ρ=0.74; P<.001). Conclusions: Our findings highlight actigraphy-derived sleep and activity features, particularly rise time and physical activity, as promising transdiagnostic markers of psychiatric symptom burden. Their consistent associations across temporal scales and diagnostic groups underscore their potential utility for scalable, real-world clinical monitoring. Future work should validate these findings in larger cohorts and explore advanced analytical methods to capture circadian rhythmicity and symptom dynamics more precisely.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".