MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415482461 · doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3622125

Deep Learning for Robust ARIS-Aided Multiuser MIMO Networks With Channel Uncertainty

2025· article· W4415482461 on OpenAlexaff
Debbarni Sarkar, Keshav Singh, Meng‐Lin Ku, Chih–Peng Li, Octavia A. Dobre

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Science and Technology Council
KeywordsBeamformingRobustness (evolution)MIMOBase stationChannel (broadcasting)Channel state informationMaximizationArtificial neural networkMultilayer perceptron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work addresses the problem of joint robust transmission, reflection, and reception strategy design in an active reconfigurable intelligent surface (ARIS)-assisted multiuser multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system. Specifically, a signal-to-interference-noise (SINR) maximization problem has been formulated by jointly optimizing the transmit beamforming matrix at the base station (BS), the linear reception filters at the users, and the reflection coefficient matrix at the ARIS. The optimization has been performed under constraints on the BS transmit power, the maximum amplification power of the ARIS, and the maximum amplitude coefficients of the ARIS. To jointly optimize RIS-assisted systems, this paper proposes an efficient deep learning (DL) model. Specifically, a multi-layer perceptron (MLP)-based deep neural network (DNN) has been designed to effectively approximate the optimal solution. Further, to handle channel state information (CSI) uncertainties arising from estimation errors and environmental variations, a novel uncertainty injection scheme has been proposed for training DL models. The output of the solution is perturbed through uncertainty injection. The model learns a robust beamforming matrix, linear reception filters, and reflection configurations that maintain high SINR under worst-case channel conditions. Simulation results demonstrate that, for the optimized phase and ARIS configuration, the proposed DL trained with the UI scheme achieves a 26.23% SINR improvement compared to the model trained without UI (WUI). In addition to the ARIS, the performance of the passive reconfigurable intelligent surface has also been analyzed. Further, the time complexity and robustness of the proposed model have been evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207