MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415495639 · doi:10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3574

Maternal characteristics, milk-borne IGF-1, and neonatal growth: Insights into endocrine and developmental programming

2025· article· W4415495639 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ashraf Soliman, Fawzia Alyafei, Nada Alaaraj, Noor Hamed, Shayma Ahmed, Shaymaa Elsayed, Dina Fawzy, Ahmed Elawwa, Hayam Al Hajjaji, Maya Itani, Nada Soliman

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingEndocrine systemHormoneGestational diabetesLeptinAdiponectinPregnancyBirth weightObesityBreast milk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Human milk contains a dynamic array of bioactive hormones and growth factors that extend beyond nutrition to influence neonatal growth, metabolism, and developmental programming. Among these, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is a pivotal mediator of tissue anabolism, gut maturation, and postnatal adaptation. Maternal metabolic and obstetric factors modify the concentration of IGF-1 and related hormones in milk, shaping infant growth trajectories from birth through early childhood. Objectives To examine how maternal characteristics—including body mass index (BMI), adiposity, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and delivery mode—affect IGF-1 and associated milk hormones (insulin, leptin, adiponectin, ghrelin). To evaluate the impact of milk-borne IGF-1 on neonatal, preterm, and early-childhood growth outcomes. To explore mechanistic pathways linking maternal endocrine status, milk hormonal composition, and infant developmental programming. Methods: A structured literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through March 2025. Eligible studies included human cohorts, case–control, and randomized trials reporting milk IGF-1 levels in relation to maternal factors or infant outcomes. Data extraction included sample characteristics, timing of milk collection, hormonal assays, and growth indices. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Cochrane RoB-2 tools. Results were synthesized descriptively due to heterogeneity across designs. Results: Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Maternal obesity and diabetes were consistently associated with elevated milk IGF-1 and insulin but reduced adiponectin and obestatin, enhancing early postnatal weight gain. Cesarean delivery and social stress were linked to lower IGF-1 levels, while early breastfeeding in preterms significantly increased serum IGF-1 and promoted catch-up growth. Experimental supplementation with enteral IGF-1 improved intestinal integrity but did not accelerate weight gain. Longitudinal cohorts revealed a biphasic effect: higher early milk IGF-1 correlated with increased infant weight at 1 year but reduced BMI at 3–5 years, reflecting adaptive metabolic programming. Pasteurization of donor milk decreased IGF-1 bioactivity by ~40%, underscoring the benefit of mother’s own milk. Conclusions: Maternal metabolic health, nutritional status, and perinatal factors critically determine milk IGF-1 bioavailability and its impact on neonatal growth. Early exposure to milk-borne IGF-1 supports gut and somatic development, particularly in preterm infants, while long-term effects suggest homeostatic regulation of adiposity. Optimizing maternal diet, glucose control, and lactation practices may enhance IGF-1 concentrations and confer lasting benefits on child growth and metabolic outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Advanced Research and ReviewsSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207