MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415500847 · doi:10.3390/curroncol32110595

Primary Intracranial Meningeal Melanocytoma with Malignant Transformation: A Case Report and Comparison of Early Versus Late Immunotherapy Interventions

2025· article· en· W4415500847 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Y. Zhang, Kun-Ming Rau, Cheng-Loong Liang, Yu‐Duan Tsai, H.R. Jheng, Kuo‐Wei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPembrolizumabIpilimumabNivolumabMelanocytomaMelanomaMalignant transformationImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary meningeal melanocytoma is an uncommon, pigmented neoplasm that rarely undergoes malignant transformation, and therapeutic guidelines remain undefined. We report a 43-year-old woman who initially presented with a sudden headache and a right temporal intraparenchymal mass. Subtotal resection revealed a melanocytoma (WHO grade I); residual tumor was treated with Gamma Knife. About 15 months later, she deteriorated rapidly due to malignant transformation with cerebral hemorrhage and spinal leptomeningeal metastasis. Pembrolizumab was initiated within four weeks of the malignant diagnosis and produced transient neurological improvement. Due to symptomatic progression, ipilimumab plus nivolumab was commenced and achieved temporary radiographic stabilization, but the patient succumbed to diffuse progression later. Including this case, only five intracranial melanocytomas with malignant transformation treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported. Our experience supports initiating immunotherapy promptly after malignant transformation and suggests that sequential dual-agent blockade may modestly extend disease control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→