MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415508007 · doi:10.1115/1.4070225

Direct Numerical Simulations and Boundary Layer Analysis in Compressor Blade Channel at Various Reynolds Numbers

2025· article· en· W4415508007 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Liu, Lei Zhou, Duo Wang, Xiang Zhang, Xiaolan Chen, Weidong Shao, Hongyi Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Turbomachinery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
FundersE-Institutes of Shanghai Municipal Education CommissionNatural Science Foundation of Shanghai
KeywordsBoundary layerReynolds numberLaminar flowSuctionTurbulenceGas compressorFlow separationBlade (archaeology)Boundary layer suction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The current study investigated the boundary layer (BL) characteristics in the V103 compressor blade channel under a series of Reynolds number (Re) conditions (Re=1.367×105, Re=1.506×105, and Re=1.645×105) using direct numerical simulation (DNS). Detailed analyses were conducted on the BL, including the separation bubble, transitions, and reattachments on both the pressure and suction surfaces. The analyses suggest that Re has a very limited impact on the size of the laminar separation bubble (LSB) on the pressure surface. However, the LSB on the suction surface significantly shrinks with increasing Re. Moreover, the BL thickness identification method based on Bernoulli’s principle was applied to complex internal flows for the first time and achieved an accurate determination of BL integral quantities. The transition locations, which were estimated using the BL shape factor, shifted upstream with the increase in Re on both pressure and suction surfaces, causing the earlier reattachment points. The study also investigated velocity profiles in the turbulent region of the BLs and successfully extended the inner-layer law from the traditional flat plate to the current curved surfaces, demonstrating the validity and accuracy of the inner-layer law’s formulations in describing the turbulent boundary layer (TBL) velocity profile. These findings provide both numerical and physical insights into the complex geometry BLs in the compressor blade channel at low-to-medium Re, offering strong potential for optimizing blade design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of TurbomachinerySame topicTurbomachinery Performance and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207