MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415513565 · doi:10.5376/tgg.2025.16.0018

Strategies to Improve Wheat's Drought and Heat Resistance

2025· article· W4415513565 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yali Wang, Rugang Xu, Zhonghui He

Bibliographic record

VenueTriticeae Genomics and Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCropProductivityCrop yieldDrought resistanceCrop managementClimate changeNutrient managementDrought tolerance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is a globally important staple crop whose productivity is increasingly threatened by climate stressors, particularly drought and heat. This study comprehensively reviews the physiological and molecular responses of wheat to drought and high temperature conditions, elaborates on the effects on plant growth and yield components, explores genetic strategies aimed at enhancing wheat stress resistance, including conventional breeding, molecular marker-assisted selection and gene editing technology, evaluates the role of agronomic and management measures such as optimized irrigation, nutrient management and crop adjustment in alleviating the effects of stress, and also focuses on the application of biotechnology and omics approaches (including transcriptomics, proteomics and microbiome engineering) in improving wheat adaptability. The effectiveness of the integrated strategy is evaluated through case studies in the Indo-Gangetic Plain, the Australian Wheat Belt and the Mediterranean region. This study highlights the importance of integrating multidisciplinary innovations for developing climate-resilient wheat systems, points out current knowledge gaps, and proposes directions for future research and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTriticeae Genomics and GeneticsSame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207