MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415513569 · doi:10.5376/tgg.2025.16.0006

Pangenome Construction of <i>Triticum aestivum</i> and Its Implications for Genetic Diversity

2025· article· W4415513569 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenyu Yang, Chunxiang Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueTriticeae Genomics and Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptabilityDomesticationGenetic diversityGenomeGene poolPopulationGenomicsGeneTrait

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Common wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) is a globally important staple food crop. However, the use of a single reference genome limits our understanding of its extensive genomic diversity. This study explores the construction of a wheat pan-genome, utilizing advanced sequencing technology, map-based genomic characterization, and integrated bioinformatics processes to capture core genes and non-essential gene content. We analyzed structural variations, gene presence and deletion variations (PAV), and copy number variations (CNV), revealing significant genetic diversity in common wheat ( T. aestivum ). These findings have profound significance for wheat breeding, enhancing trait association research, genomic selection, and adaptability to climate change. We further discussed the evolutionary insights gained from pan-genome data, including domestication events, population structure and gene family expansion, and highlighted the key contributions of the "10+ Wheat Genome Project". A comprehensive understanding of the wheat genome highlights the necessity of continuously developing inclusive and scalable pan-genomes, integrating multi-omics data, and conducting international cooperation, ultimately aiming to support sustainable agriculture and crop improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTriticeae Genomics and GeneticsSame topicRice Cultivation and Yield ImprovementFrench-language works237,207