MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415522320 · doi:10.1186/s40621-025-00621-w

Safe system approach to preventing cyclist fatalities: safety by design for urban and rural environments

2025· article· en· W4415522320 on OpenAlexafffund
Tanya Charyk Stewart, Allison C. Pellar, Moheem Halari, Kevin J. McClafferty, Pascal Verville, Michael J. Pickup, Douglas D. Fraser, Jason Gilliland, Michael J. Shkrum

Bibliographic record

VenueInjury Epidemiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsTransport CanadaAdvantage Forensics (Canada)London Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsPoison controlPublic healthOccupational safety and healthLegislatureInjury preventionSuicide preventionHuman factors and ergonomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cyclists are vulnerable road users, with preventable deaths increasing by 48% over the past decade. This study aimed to review the epidemiology of cyclist fatalities to identify risk factors for targeted interventions through a safe system approach, with a focus on urban and rural environments. METHODS: Data on fatal cyclist and motor vehicle collisions (CMVC) and injuries were collected from the Office of the Chief Coroner (2013-19), including selected crash investigations and expert reviews by a multidisciplinary team. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and urban vs. rural CMVC were compared using Pearson chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: There were 83 fatal cyclist collisions (81% male), with 6% children, 13% youth, 69% adults, and 12% seniors (median age = 48, ISS = 75). The head was the most severely injured body region across all age groups (median AIS = 5), except for children, whose thoracic injuries were more severe. Overall, 62% of cyclists were not wearing helmets, and 24% were impaired. Expert review found that 60% of child cyclist fatalities were run over, all of whom were ≤ 6 years. Distractions from cell phones (1%) or headphones (8%) may have contributed to CMVC. Urban collisions (49 cyclists; 59%) accounted for all child deaths and had significantly more collisions involving intersections (57% vs. 6%; p < 0.001), low-speed crashes (33% vs. 0%; p < 0.001), bike lanes (29% vs. 0%; p < 0.001), and heavy vehicles (31% vs. 6%; p = 0.006). Rural collisions were associated with higher speeds (> 50 km/h, 94% vs. 49%; p < 0.001), dark lighting (44% vs. 4%; p < 0.001), and riding on the roadway with traffic (56% vs. 16%; p < 0.001). No rural CMVCs had sidewalks or bike lanes (0% vs. 84%; 0% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cyclists face severe injury and death risks in both urban and rural settings. A safe system approach recognizes human vulnerability and the inevitability of mistakes. Engineering countermeasures, such as road separation, better lighting in rural areas, traffic calming, and vehicle safety features (i.e., guard rails, advanced headlights, and cyclist detection), support CMVC prevention. Public health campaigns and legislative action, along with equitable implementation across urban and rural areas, facilitate improving cyclists' safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInjury EpidemiologySame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207