MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415523139 · doi:10.1002/brb3.71014

Exploring the Association Between Per‐ and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Exposure and the Risk of Stroke: A Systematic Investigation Using NHANES Data Analysis, Network Toxicology and Molecular Docking Approaches

2025· article· en· W4415523139 on OpenAlexaff
Yanjie Jiang, Ling Li, Shipeng Zhang, Man Lu, Xingyi He, Rui Fu, Mingjie Tang, Yinghong Li, Qinwei Fu, Zhihui Jin, Wenshan Li, Xiaoyu Zhu, Enjie Tang, Hanyu Wang, Lu Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Behavior · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)EffectorRisk assessmentStroke (engine)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic evidence regarding the association between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure and stroke risk remains limited and inconclusive. Consequently, the current study sought to further examine this association and clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cohort study analyzed data from 8081 participants of the 2003-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), employing multistage weighted logistic regression, weighted quantile sum (WQS) modeling, and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) to systematically evaluate the association between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure and stroke. Restricted cubic spline analysis was subsequently used to examine the nonlinear dose-response relationships. To investigate the underlying mechanisms, we integrated data from six databases (e.g., ChEMBL and GeneCards) to identify common molecular targets of PFAS and stroke. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was then constructed to identify core genes, while the binding interactions between PFAS and key targets were evaluated through molecular docking and dynamics simulations. Finally, functional enrichment analysis was performed on these core genes using the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, six individual PFAS compounds, including perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.09-2.31), exhibited a significant positive association with the risk of stroke. The WQS model revealed a significant positive association for the PFAS mixture (OR = 1.027, 95% CI: 1.017-1.036), with PFOS contributing the highest weight (0.379). These findings were corroborated by the PLS-DA model, and the association remained significant in all subgroup analyses. The network toxicology analysis identified 183 common targets between PFOS and stroke, while the subsequent PPI network analysis identified six core genes, including AKT1 and HSP90AA1. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses demonstrated that these targets were markedly enriched in pathways associated with lipid and atherosclerosis metabolism, in addition to the PI3K-Akt and MAPK signaling pathways. Furthermore, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations supported potential interactions between PFOS and core targets such as AKT1. This suggests that PFOS may contribute to stroke pathogenesis by disrupting pathways involved in inflammatory regulation and apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a positive association between PFOS exposure and stroke risk, suggesting that the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, along with its key effector molecule AKT1, may play a crucial role in mediating PFOS-induced stroke, thereby offering a theoretical foundation for the prevention and management of PFOS-associated stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain and BehaviorSame topicPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFrench-language works237,207