cryoJAX: A Cryo-electron Microscopy Image Simulation Library In JAX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract While cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has come to prominence in the last decade due to its ability to resolve biomolecular complexes at atomic resolution, advancements in experimental and computational methods have made cryo-EM promising for investigating intracellular organization and heterogeneous molecular states. A primary challenge for these alternative applications is the development of techniques for cryo-EM data analysis, which are very computationally demanding. To this end, it is advantageous to leverage advanced scientific computing frameworks for statistical analysis. One such framework is JAX, an emerging array-oriented Python numerical computing package for automatic differentiation and vectorization with a growing ecosystem for statistical inference and machine learning. We have developed cryoJAX, a cryo-EM image simulation library for building computational data analysis applications in JAX. CryoJAX is a flexible modeling language for cryo-EM image formation and therefore can support a wide range of data analysis downstream. By integrating with the JAX ecosystem, cryoJAX enables the development and deployment of algorithms for the growing breadth of scientific applications for cryo-EM. Synopsis The authors have developed cryoJAX, a cryo-EM image simulation library for developing data analysis techniques across cryo-EM modalities. CryoJAX is built on JAX, an emerging scientific computing framework in Python well suited for cryo-EM data analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".