Physics-informed neural ordinary differential equations for multi-zone residential thermal modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Proposed NODEs match predictive accuracy of traditional NODEs and LSTMs. • IG attributions for proposed NODEs align with localized heating and solar gains. • A masked architecture improves interpretability by incorporating physical priors. • Proposed NODEs are robust to predicting unevenly spaced data from occupied residences. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems account for a large share of residential energy use and drive peak electricity demand. Yet, deploying smart, adaptive temperature controllers is hindered by the cost and complexity of obtaining accurate building models. In this work, a physics‑informed neural differential equation (NODE) approach is introduced to learn multi‑zone thermal dynamics of electrical baseboard heated homes from thermostat data. First, a fully connected data‑driven NODE captures temperature evolution and heating input effects without any prior building specifics. Second, insights of the thermal processes are embedded into the network via a masked architecture, improving interpretability and reducing non-physical cross‑zone couplings. Both NODE variants are benchmarked against a discrete‑time LSTM on hourly experimental data from a controlled test house and then the masked NODE architecture is used on irregularly sampled measurements from 16 occupied Québec residences. Experiments show that (a) masked NODEs match predictive accuracy of fully connected NODEs and LSTMs with respective average RMSEs of 0.49 °C, 0.40 °C and 0.55 °C on the data from the controlled test house, (b) integrated‑gradient attributions align with physical heat transfer laws in scenarios involving localized heating and solar gains, and (c) NODE models remain robust to unevenly spaced data with an average weighted RMSE of 0.48 °C over the 16 occupied residences. These results demonstrate that NODEs offer a broadly adaptable and interpretable framework for residential HVAC modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".