MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415531263 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116623

Physics-informed neural ordinary differential equations for multi-zone residential thermal modeling

2025· article· en· W4415531263 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Gabriel Sabbagh, Massimo Cimmino, Benoit Delcroix

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Buildings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecPolytechnique Montréal
FundersMitacsHydro-Québec
KeywordsInterpretabilityNode (physics)ThermostatArtificial neural networkOrdinary differential equationThermalTest dataControl theory (sociology)Linearization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Proposed NODEs match predictive accuracy of traditional NODEs and LSTMs. • IG attributions for proposed NODEs align with localized heating and solar gains. • A masked architecture improves interpretability by incorporating physical priors. • Proposed NODEs are robust to predicting unevenly spaced data from occupied residences. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems account for a large share of residential energy use and drive peak electricity demand. Yet, deploying smart, adaptive temperature controllers is hindered by the cost and complexity of obtaining accurate building models. In this work, a physics‑informed neural differential equation (NODE) approach is introduced to learn multi‑zone thermal dynamics of electrical baseboard heated homes from thermostat data. First, a fully connected data‑driven NODE captures temperature evolution and heating input effects without any prior building specifics. Second, insights of the thermal processes are embedded into the network via a masked architecture, improving interpretability and reducing non-physical cross‑zone couplings. Both NODE variants are benchmarked against a discrete‑time LSTM on hourly experimental data from a controlled test house and then the masked NODE architecture is used on irregularly sampled measurements from 16 occupied Québec residences. Experiments show that (a) masked NODEs match predictive accuracy of fully connected NODEs and LSTMs with respective average RMSEs of 0.49 °C, 0.40 °C and 0.55 °C on the data from the controlled test house, (b) integrated‑gradient attributions align with physical heat transfer laws in scenarios involving localized heating and solar gains, and (c) NODE models remain robust to unevenly spaced data with an average weighted RMSE of 0.48 °C over the 16 occupied residences. These results demonstrate that NODEs offer a broadly adaptable and interpretable framework for residential HVAC modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy and BuildingsSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207