A systematic literature review of CVID reveals pervasive detrimental noninfectious manifestations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Noninfectious manifestations of common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) are not formally summarized. We performed a systematic literature review to generate a comprehensive reference for the field. Splenomegaly was the most reported manifestation across 53 publications, occurring in a median of 35.2% of patients. Frequently reported digestive system manifestations included diarrhea (median 27.8%; 21 publications), hepato(spleno)megaly (median, 21.0%; 19 publications), portal hypertension (median 21.0%; 3 publications), nodular lymphoid hyperplasia (median, 17.0%; 9 publications), and enteropathy (median, 16.0%; 34 publications). Other notable manifestations included interstitial lung disease (median, 8.7%; 32 publications) and autoimmune cytopenias (median 18.0%; 21 publications). Steroids and rituximab were the most frequently reported treatments. Numerous manifestations significantly adversely affected survival, including lymphoma, granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease, splenomegaly, and liver diseases. These comprehensive data document the pervasiveness and negative impact of noninfectious manifestations in CVID and support a call to action to develop novel therapeutics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it