MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415533751 · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103161

The Non-Cisgender Experience of Menstruation and Menopause: Literature Review and Recommendations

2025· article· en· W4415533751 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Annabel Gravely, Lori A. Brotto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenstruationMEDLINEAlternative medicineSystematic reviewPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This communication examines the experience of menstruation and menopause, and the influence of gender identity. Gender affirming hormone therapy and sociocultural contributors in healthcare pose unique challenges for transgender i and non-binary ii persons in the context of menstruation and menopause. Moreover, gender diverse iii persons experience a higher prevalence of chronic pelvic pain, and barriers to diagnosis of endometriosis and pre-menstrual dysphoric disorder. While there is much discussion surrounding menopause hormone therapy, there has been inadequate attention to this topic in the context of gender-diverse experiences. Here we provide clinical and research recommendations for a treatment approach in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaSame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207