Planning energy hubs with hydrogen and battery storage for flexible ramping market participation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration of renewable resources with advanced storage technologies is critical for sustainable energy systems. In this paper, a planning framework for an energy hub incorporating hydrogen and renewable energy systems is developed, with the objective of minimizing operational costs while participating in flexible ramping product (FRP) markets. The energy hub is designed to utilize a hybrid storage system comprising multi-type battery energy storage (BESS) accounting for diverse chemistries and degradation behaviors and hydrogen storage (HS) to meet concurrent electric and hydrogen demands. To address uncertainties in renewable generation and market prices, a stochastic optimization model is developed to determine the optimal investment capacities, while optimizing operational decisions under uncertainty using scenario-based stochastic programming. Financial risks associated with price and renewable variability are mitigated through the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) metric. Case studies demonstrate that hybrid storage systems, including both BESS and HS, can reduce total costs by 23.62% compared to single-storage configurations that rely solely on BESS. Based on the results, BESS participates more in providing flexible ramp-up services, while HS plays a major role in providing flexible ramp-down services. The results emphasize the critical role of co-optimized hydrogen and multi-type BESS in enhancing grid flexibility and economic viability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".