MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415540549 · doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100230

Probing longitudinal dynamics in the pion

2025· article· en· W4415540549 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruben Sandapen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of subatomic particles and cosmology. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnsatzString (physics)PionDegenerate energy levelsCoupling (piping)Wave equationWave functionObservable

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compute the low energy observables for the pion using the light-front holographic Schrödinger Equation for the transverse internal dynamics, together with an ansatz for the equation governing longitudinal dynamics. Our ansatz accommodates ’t Hooft and Li-Vary Equations of ( 1 + 1 ) -dim QCD, as well as an AdS 3 string equation recently derived by Vegh. While the ’t Hooft and Li-Vary Equations are degenerate in describing the data, we find a viable scenario where the data favour the Vegh Equation in the weak string coupling limit. We also find a longitudinal wavefunction that is rather more peaked about x ∼ 1 / 2 than in previous studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of subatomic particles and cosmology.Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207