MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415546540 · doi:10.1080/08865655.2025.2576191

Nature without Borders: Art and Ecological Resistance in Silvia Cini’s <i>Avant que nature meure</i>

2025· article· en· W4415546540 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Borselli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Borderlands Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographies of human-animal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistance (ecology)Variety (cybernetics)AnthropocentrismProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary ecological art increasingly attempts at rematerialising the numerous ‘borders’ invisibly contributing to the stories of environmental violence of the ‘Anthropocene.’ In this perspective, Silvia Cini’s interdisciplinary initiative Avant que nature meure (2015–2024) aims at exposing the entanglement of the main “borders” perpetuating human exceptionalism and its destructive consequences on the environment—i.e. the enclosure and exploitation of nonhuman life for human profit, as well as racial and gender domination. By intersecting visual, political, and legal tactics—spanning from the creation of a participatory repository of urban flowering sites to neo-situationist dérives, public gatherings, workshops, and museum exhibitions,—Cini advocates an interventionist and community-based approach to art as a means of direct action and social transformation. In fact, the recognition (both in visual and political terms) of orchids’ resilience in a man-altered landscape discloses, in the artist’s intention, alternative forms of coexistence to the ecocidal, neocolonial, and hetero-patriarchal apparatus, envisioning a radical renegotiation of hegemonic relations of (in)visibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Borderlands StudiesSame topicGeographies of human-animal interactionsFrench-language works237,207