MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415547480 · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2025.101802

iPASecIoT: An intelligent pipeline for automatic and adaptive feature extraction for secure IoT device identification and intrusion detection

2025· article· en· W4415547480 on OpenAlexaff
Ogobuchi Daniel Okey, Sajjad Dadkhah, Heather Molyneaux, Demóstenes Zegarra Rodríguez, João Henrique Kleinschmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet of Things · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsResearch and Productivity CouncilUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsScalabilityIdentification (biology)Intrusion detection systemPipeline (software)InferenceFeature (linguistics)ObfuscationFeature extraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The widespread integration of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has enhanced the intelligence of homes, industries, and offices, yet it introduces critical security challenges due to their susceptibility to dynamic threats and behavioral heterogeneity, necessitating identification via communication patterns rather than mere physical recognition. This paper addresses the demand for a unified security framework in IoT ecosystems, where devices, limited by diverse protocols and constrained computational resources, face attacks such as DNS tunneling, MAC spoofing, and several other threats. Existing approaches, which rely on coarse-grained signatures or segregated machine learning for device identification and intrusion detection, exhibit limited resilience, increased operational overhead, poor cross-network adaptability, and scalability constraints in real-time dynamic settings. We propose iPASecIoT, a single-model framework that concurrently identifies IoT devices and detects intrusions using fine-grained behavioral fingerprints. Our methodology combines machine and deep learning algorithms with a modified firefly algorithm employing a kappa score-based voting mechanism for adaptive feature selection, yielding a lightweight, resource-efficient model by optimizing agreement beyond chance across network traffic, inter-arrival times, and protocol-specific features. Evaluated on the CICIoMT2024, CICIoT2023, and UNSW2019 datasets, iPASecIoT achieves mean F1 scores of 99.99 %, 99.88 %, and 98.35 % for device identification and 99.96 %, 99.38 %, and 98.79 % for threat classification across the CICIoMT2024, CICIoT2023, and UNSW2019 datasets, respectively. With a mean inference time of 0.0005 seconds per sample and a mean Hamming loss of ≈ 0.001, iPASecIoT provides a pioneering, efficient, and scalable solution to counter evolving security threats in heterogeneous IoT environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet of ThingsSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207