MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415551040 · doi:10.1002/vrc2.70243

A rare case of spinal rudimentary meningocoele mimicking a spinal dermoid cyst in a cat

2025· article· en· W4415551040 on OpenAlexaff
Barnabé Courzereaux, Alex Terreros, Audrey Albert, Marilène Paquet

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Record Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint HyacintheCTT Group (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminectomyPresentation (obstetrics)Dermoid cystLesionDorsumContractureCase presentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This report describes a rare case of a rudimentary meningocoele in a 1‐year‐old Scottish Fold cat. The presentation included multiple congenital abnormalities of the thoracolumbar vertebrae and sacrum, as well as a spastic contracture of the right pelvic limb. Advanced imaging, including plain computed tomography and fistulography, confirmed the diagnosis and aided in planning an L6 to S2 dorsal laminectomy for lesion excision. Surgery was performed to prevent complications such as infection and the progression of neurological deficits. Exploration of the lesion revealed a bifid cauda equina. The immediate postoperative outcome was satisfactory. The owner reported an excellent outcome at the 6‐month follow‐up. This rare case highlights that proliferation of meningothelial elements can be present in the cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues, that spinal dysraphism anomalies are often multiple rather than isolated, and that there is significant variability in their presentation. It also provides detailed insights into their diagnosis and surgical management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Record Case ReportsSame topicSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsFrench-language works237,207