MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415554324 · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2025.344699

Selective molecular interplay in electrochemical sensing: DNA-templated Hg(II) capture and enzyme-driven SeO42− reduction for mercury removal

2025· article· en· W4415554324 on OpenAlexafffund
Zixin Yu, Meissam Noroozifar, Kağan Kerman, Heinz‐Bernhard Kraatz

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytica Chimica Acta · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsDetection limitMercury (programming language)ElectrochemistrySelenateCyclic voltammetryDielectric spectroscopyElectrodeInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

precipitation. The sensor exhibited exceptional selectivity, a detection limit in the sub-nanomolar range, and strong anti-interference performance from competing metal ions and oxyanions. Environmental sample testing further validated its applicability, showing high recovery rates (90.3-109.8 %). The results showed excellent agreement with the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) measurements as a conventional Hg(II) detection method. This work advances DNA-enzyme-mediated electrochemical sensing by integrating molecular recognition with an intrinsic detoxification mechanism. The findings provided a promising foundation for the next-generation bioelectronic platforms, enabling real-time monitoring of both inorganic mercury and selenate and a potential mercury removal method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytica Chimica ActaSame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207