MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415557571 · doi:10.4138/atlgeo.2025.018

Foundations of geological carbon storage modelling and the Atlantic Canada context

2025· article· en· W4415557571 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geoscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineCaprockContext (archaeology)Carbon capture and storage (timeline)Climate changeContainment (computer programming)WorkflowSedimentary basinOverpressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geological Carbon Storage (GCS) is an essential climate mitigation strategy, enabling the long-term storage of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in deep subsurface formations. Offshore Atlantic Canada offers significant potential due to favourable geology, extensive subsurface data, and infrastructure from past hydrocarbon development. Major sedimentary basins such as the Scotian, Jeanne d’Arc, and Orphan contain structural traps, thick saline aquifers, and effective caprock seals that are critical for secure CO2 storage. Successful GCS depends on robust geological modelling workflows that incorporate subsurface heterogeneity, trapping mechanisms, and containment integrity. This paper reviews the foundational components of geological models - structural, stratigraphic, geometric, and topological frameworks – combined with numerical simulators to predict plume migration, pressure evolution, and geochemical interactions. Modelling supports all project stages, from site screening to post-injection monitoring, and is guided by parameters such as capacity, injectivity, containment, and storage efficiency. International offshore analogs such as Sleipner, Snøhvit, Northern Lights, Tomakomai, and Porthos provide valuable lessons in infrastructure reuse, regulatory development, and public engagement. These projects highlight the importance of tailored monitoring and verification plans, hub-based infrastructure models, and early-stage demonstration projects to build public trust. Offshore Atlantic Canada faces unique challenges including complex structural geology, overpressure zones, and salt tectonics, necessitating detailed technical evaluation. Recommended actions include high-resolution geologic modelling, probabilistic capacity assessments, and the creation of a regional carbon storage atlas. As regulatory frameworks evolve and carbon management becomes increasingly urgent, offshore Atlantic Canada is well-positioned to become a leader in safe, large-scale geological CO₂ storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeoscienceSame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207