Strengthening the Aging Brain: Functional Connectivity Changes After a Language-Based Cognitive Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Accumulating evidence suggests that cognitive training can induce functional reorganization of intrinsic connectivity networks involved in higher-order cognitive processes. However, few interventions have specifically targeted language, an essential domain tightly interwoven with memory, attention, and executive functions. Given their foundational role in communication, reasoning, and knowledge acquisition, enhancing language-related abilities may yield widespread cognitive benefits. This study investigated the neural impact of a new structured, language-based cognitive training program on neurotypical older adults. Methods: Twenty Brazilian Portuguese-speaking women (aged 63–77 years; schooling 9–20 years; low-to-medium socioeconomic status) participated in linguistic activities designed to engage language and general cognitive processing. Behavioral testing and resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) were conducted before and after the intervention. Results: Functional connectivity analyses revealed significant post-intervention increases in connectivity within the frontoparietal network, critical for language processing, and the ventral attentional network, associated with attentional control. Conclusions: The observed neural enhancements indicate substantial plasticity in cognitive networks among older adults, highlighting the effectiveness of linguistic interventions in modulating critical cognitive functions. These findings provide a foundation for future research on targeted cognitive interventions to promote healthy aging and sustain cognitive vitality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".