Probabilistic Assessment of Crop Yield Loss Under Drought and Global Warming in the Canadian Prairies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study assessed the vulnerability of canola, spring wheat, and barley yields in the Canadian Prairies to drought stress under future climate scenarios, integrating DSSAT crop models with NEX-GDDP CMIP6 projections and probabilistic copula analysis. The DSSAT simulations reproduced historical yields with high accuracy (d > 0.7, nRMSE < 15–20%), confirming its applicability for Prairie agroecosystems. Results indicate distinct crop-specific sensitivities to warming: barley showed relative resilience with modest yield gains (~10%) at 1.5–2 °C of global warming (GW), wheat exhibited heterogeneous responses with early minor gains (~1%) followed by declines (~8%) beyond 3 °C of GW, and canola displayed consistent and substantial losses (20–37%) even under moderate warming. Spatial analysis highlighted relatively stable regions in northern Alberta, central Saskatchewan, and southern Manitoba (Gray and Black soil zones), while the southern and southwestern Prairie areas (Brown and Black-Brown zones) showed the greatest yield declines. Copula-based analysis further revealed that canola is most vulnerable to dry conditions, with yield exceedance probabilities falling from 62% (wet years) to ~25–28% (dry years) under GW. These findings underscore that Prairie crop production faces increasingly heterogeneous risks, with canola emerging as the most climate-sensitive crop. Targeted adaptation strategies such as stress-tolerant cultivars, shifting cropping zones, and improved water management will be essential to mitigate projected drought impacts and sustain Prairie agricultural productivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".