MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415570921 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.11.045

INTRAOPERATIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE IN A LEVEL 1 TRAUMA CENTRE OPERATING ROOM

2025· article· en· W4415570921 on OpenAlexaff
J. Thibault, W. Naciri, Dominique M. Rouleau, J. Chapleau

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthopedic surgeryRadiation exposurePelvisDosimeterTrauma centerInternal fixationAcetabulumRadiation dose

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluoroscopy is often required intra-operatively in orthopedics in order to better visualize either a reduction or the position of internal fixation. Although patient exposure is punctual, Trauma surgeons and operating room (OR) staff are exposed to high cumulative amounts of radiation. The goal of this study is to report the average radiation exposure for common orthopedic trauma procedures for different OR members: orthopedic surgeon, anesthesia team and nursing staff. We did a prospective observational study in 100 cases over 4 months at our level 1 trauma center where we collected radiation levels from dosimeters in different OR areas. Data was collected simultaneously at 1 meter from the C-arm (A, surgeon), 2m (B, anesthesia bay) and 3m (C, nursing computer). Data was subdivised according to the radiated body part and compared to common radiology procedures and daily exposure. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Dosimeter A recorded a significantly higher amount of radiation than the other 2, regardless of the fracture location. Higher levels of radiation were recorded for fixation of centrally located fractures (pelvis, p<0.001) followed by lower extremity fractures (p<0.001), and upper extremity fractures (p<0.001) regardless of the dosimeter. For fractures distal to the elbow, the average radiation exposure to the surgeon was 19.77 ± 54.40 µSv and 0.49 ± 0.93 µSv at 3 meters (nursing station). Numbers were much higher for pelvis and acetabulum surgery with averages between 62.88 ± 79.62 µSv (1 meter) to 1.4 ± 1.89 µSv (3 meters). As a comparison the average natural radiation exposure from being 1 hour in our OR, which is on the 6th floor of our hospital, is around 0,14 µSv. With the following results, we can confidently say that the surgeon, resident and scrub nurse in proximity of the C-Arm are the most exposed to cumulative radiation throughout operative cases. Radiation can be quite low and almost negligible at 3 meters, especially for extremity fractures (distal to the elbow, distal to the knee). On the other hand, femur and pelvic surgery generate much higher doses of radiations and lead protection is still highly recommended for the OR team.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207