MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415579789 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.378

NCDs burden among immigrant communities: global perspectives

2025· article· en· W4415579789 on OpenAlexaffabout
Saverio Stranges, Shehzad Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationPublic healthHealth careMental healthSocial determinants of healthHealth equityPopulationDisease burdenDiseaseRace and health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Globally, the burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) falls disproportionately on underserved populations. Immigrants are particularly vulnerable due to economic instability, social and institutional marginalization and persistent barriers to healthcare access. Structural discrimination and cultural differences further hinder their ability to find and use appropriate services, negatively impacting health outcomes. Methods An overview will be provided on NCDs burden among immigrants and public health challenges to promote prevention and management, showcasing the Canadian context. Results The rising prevalence of both physical and mental chronic conditions among immigrants is shaped by social and environmental determinants of health, alongside behavioural risks such as unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, sleep problems, low health literacy and limited access to care. Immigrants often face additional obstacles to preventive care and chronic disease management, including difficulties obtaining health insurance, linguistic and cultural barriers, fragmented health records and challenges associated with acculturation. Despite these trends, research on burden of NCDs and barriers to healthcare access among immigrant populations remains limited. In Canada, immigration has been a major driver of demographic and economic growth, with immigrants representing around 23% of the population. As the immigrant population grows, its health status will increasingly influence both the healthcare system and broader population health. Despite universal health coverage, evidence indicates that immigrants continue to experience inequities in accessing primary and specialist care, particularly for chronic and mental health conditions. Conclusions Addressing health disparities requires pragmatic public health policies aimed at reducing structural, cultural and social barriers, with a strong focus on improving access to chronic disease prevention, screening and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207