MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415585938 · doi:10.21083/crrf.v31i1.7253

Sustainable Community Conference Program

2023· article· W4415585938 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Conference Organizers

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity and Sustainable Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipFoundation (evidence)Sustainable communityCommonsRural areaRural community

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This session asks what is the role of the local and how is it understood in an increasingly globalized economy.What is the role of vernacular in contemporary rural architecture?What is the role of intangible cultural heritage in informing new understandings of built heritage?How might architecture move beyond critical regionalism and its formal and material understandings of regional specificity?How might we understand heritage in ways that move beyond reuse and preservation?•

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2550.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Rural Revitalization FoundationSame topicCommunity and Sustainable DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207